Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01347
Original file (MD04-01347.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT




ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD04-01347

Applicant’s Request

The application for discharge review was received on 20040827. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041229. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNCHARACTERIZED/HARDSHIP, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6407.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I feel it should be change to honorable since my discharge was for hardship.”


Documentation

In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:

None


PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):

         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                970925 - 980104  COG

Period of Service Under Review :

Date of Enlistment: 980105               Date of Discharge: 980511

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 04 07
         Inactive: None

Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 5

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 73

Highest Rank: Pvt                          MOS: 9900

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

None

Military Decorations: None

Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNCHARACTERIZED/HARDSHIP, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6407

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980417:  Applicant’s father requested Applicant’s discharge due to the father’s disability.

980427:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Not adapting to the Marine Corps’ way of life.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

980429:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for an uncharacterized discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to hardship.

980429:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

980507:  Commanding Officer recommended an uncharacterized discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to hardship.

980507:  GCMCA [CG, MCRD/ERR] directed the Applicant's uncharacterized discharge by reason of hardship.


PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19980511 with an entry level separation due to hardship (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The Applicant’s discharge by reason of hardship does not provide a basis for an honorable characterization of service. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given characterization of service as “uncharacterized” unless there were unusual circumstances regarding performance or conduct which would merit an “honorable” characterization. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than five months in the military to warrant a change of discharge. With respect to non-service related administrative matters, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization. Relief denied.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country.
Normally, to permit relief, an inequity or impropriety must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such inequity or impropriety is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.














Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 95 until 31 Aug 2001), paragraph 6407.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502,
Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023



Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501421

    Original file (MD0501421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01350

    Original file (MD04-01350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given characterization of service "Uncharacterized" or entry-level separation unless there were unusual circumstances regarding performance or conduct, which would merit an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00295

    Original file (MD04-00295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00295 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031201. My whole life was changed as result of this accident and I should have received an honorable discharge under medical conditions. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his time in the military to warrant a change to “honorable.” The official records and the additional documents supplied by the Applicant, do not support his contention of a “cover up”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01072

    Original file (MD04-01072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than two months in the military to warrant a change of discharge to "honorable." A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00449

    Original file (MD04-00449.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00099

    Original file (MD01-00099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00099 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001024, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Board found that the applicant’s characterization of service was awarded based on the applicant’s conduct while on active duty, and not on his mother’s medical condition. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500608

    Original file (MD0500608.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 010319: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of homosexual conduct as evidenced by his statement that he admitted to being a homosexual. Accordingly, the Board has determined that the Applicant’s separation by reason of homosexual conduct was equitable and proper.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600676

    Original file (MD0600676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decisional Issues: None Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20000303 - 20000425 COG Active: None Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00949

    Original file (MD04-00949.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given characterization of service as “uncharacterized” unless there were unusual...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00900

    Original file (MD04-00900.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20031022 with an entry level separation by reason of...